Twitter Myrmecology: Pheromones in the Twitterstream
Don’t feel bad if the term myrmecology means nothing to you — I had to look it up too. From Wikipedia:
Myrmecology (from Greek: μύρμεξ, myrmex, “ant”; and λόγος, logos, “knowledge”) is the scientific study of ants, a branch of entomology. Ants are often chosen as a study group to answer questions on the evolution of social systems.
I was introduced to myrmecology while doing a little research for this post, prompted by a post-convo conversation with Corey Reid (FreshBooks), Michele Perras (OCAD MEIC and lots of others), and Patrick Keenan (The Movement). Corey got me started down this path with a comment that ants find food sources in the same way that collaborative societies find information, which immediately made me think of Twitter. Stick with me for a brief myrmecological detour before I bring it back around for your moment of zen.
A Brief Explanation of Ant Trail Pheromones, or Any Excuse to Show Off My Newly Acquired Ant Knowledge
Like many insects, ants release pheromones as a means of communicating with other members of their colony. Just like that awkward moment in the fancy staffed bathroom when you’re offered a spritz of cologne, they have a number of different chemical scents they can lay down depending on the job at hand. We’re particularly interested in the ‘Trail Pheromone’ that some species use to signal a path to food, but their olfactory arsenal is also well equipped with smell bombs for alerting their colony mates to danger and for luring them into producing lots and lots of baby ants.
The best explanation I could find of trail pheromones was on the MUTE Sourceforge site, a project to create a simple, anonymous file sharing network that uses ant-inspired behaviour to route messages. Their explanation goes into more detail than I need here, so take a look at their How Ants Find Food page if I’ve peeked your Formicidae curiosity beyond cursory levels or follow along below if you just want to get to the good stuff. Also, for those of you who are sticklers for species accurate posts, note that this applies to species of ants who use pheromones for navigation, rather than crazy things like the earth’s magnetic field or visual landmarks (for real).
I’m going to tell this story by relating the parable of the Four Crazy Ant Brothers, Adam, Bob, Carl, and Doug.

Four ants set out from The Nest in search of Food
One day, the foursome were sippin’ some fine vine dew at The Nest when they began to feel quite hungry. Being ants and all, they set out in random directions in search of food. Lucky Adam Ant is the first to stumble across the stash of Johnny’s Hamburgers.

Adam finds Food while his brothers continue to wander
Being conscientious ants and all, they made sure to lay down a trail of pheromones as they wandered, making it easy to backtrack when they hit the jackpot. Adam grabs a tasty, tasty piece of burger and makes for The Nest while his brothers continue to wander aimlessly.

Bob finds the same Food while Doug retraces Adam's steps
Adam finds no one at The Nest so he drops off his bite and heads back out on his trail to get more. Doug happily finds Adam’s trail, which is now three times as strong as his own, so he takes a left and starts following along, sure that he’s on the trail of juicy burgers. Meanwhile, Bob happens across the stash from the other side and makes like a bandit, carting a chunk-o-burger homebound along his own trail. Carl has encountered Doug’s trail and since he hasn’t found any food yet either, figures he might as well follow along.

Carl makes a wrong turn while Bob continues to wander
Bob’s route is much longer than Adam’s, so he’s still of wandering in the hinterlands with his rapidly cooling burger bite. Adam and Doug are on the Highway to Happiness, making off with delicious morsels as quickly as they can carry them and strengthening the trail with every pass. Clueless Carl, having run into Adam’s strong trail, decides to take a right and heads back to The Nest empty-pincered.

The Four Brothers are reunited in their quest
In the last instalment of our tasty tale, Bob finally makes it home only to find a much stronger trail heading off in the other direction. Happy to abandon his thankless trek, he joins in with the rest of the crew. Carl makes it back to The Nest and realizes his mistake, so he turns tail and makes off in the opposite direction. The Four Brothers are now a ruthless hamburger fetching machine, having optimized on the shortest route to Johnny’s and quickly making off with some poor sap’s lunch.
Bringing it Back to Twitter
So, you’re surely wondering, how could this possibly relate to Twitter? Think about the behaviour of your Twitter network.

Twitter is the Shortest Path to Food
We all go out into the ‘net looking for interesting content, sometimes even wandering at random in the pursuit of the next data hit. When we used to stumble upon (or even StumbleUpon) a tasty morsel, we put the URL into places like del.icio.us or IM or email: all long and asynchronous ‘Bob’ routes when it comes to information sharing. Now that our brains are connected to the firehose directly, we pop into our Twitter client of choice and create a quick, immediate, synchronous, ‘Adam’ route to the information. If this is the first time our friends have seen it, they follow the trail and check it out for themselves, retweeting the link if the food is to their liking. The trail gets stronger with each retweet, eventually earning a hashtag, hitting the trending topics list, and possibly (albeit briefly) becoming the strongest scent on Twitter. The colony establishes the most direct route to the information and digests it until there’s nothing left, moving on when a new stash is found.
I’m not entirely sure what we can learn from this in a bigger picture sense. Is there a way to use this new model to influence the behaviour of the rest of the colony? Are there shorter routes that could be mapped to tasty food? Leave your thoughts below.
Likely-related posts:
- Twitter to the Max: Hotel Max Comes Through The Hotel Max in Seattle way overdelivers...









very interesting…i like where you are going with this! I need to chew on it a bit..;)
Bob, Doug, Adam and Carl found the burger. Hooray! But what they didn't realize is that there was an entire heap of discarded burgers in the dumpster just off to the right. An endless source of delicious food! They may discover it eventually. Or maybe not.
So what does this have to do with people? And Twitter?
Here's one of my great concerns with social networking and "being a webby system" in general. You have your network. Let's say it's 50 people. Someone in your network discovers some great content or a new great contact. This is shared with the network. This keeps happening. The network grows and more content flows within it. Great, right?
But there's one problem. Like attracts like in networks. The people you connect to are sort of like you. And the info you get is content you are often already interested in. And it often reinforces your own point of view.
The thing is that innovation relies on diversity. Exposure to new ideas and new people. Really new ideas and people – not just sort-of new ideas and people. Ideas and people that challenge us. So I worry that by surrounding ourselves with stuff and people that we are already 'in tune' with limits our chance to really be innovative and achieve breakthroughs. We already know that we can – and often do – surround ourselves with news that reinforces our perspective. I wonder how big a challenge this is when it comes to self-reinforcing and self-referential social networks.
(this same thing happens with our brains, right? We think one way. Then we think a second way. Then we think that first way again. And again. And again. And suddenly those synapses have become so well tread that they become ruts, and we can never get to that second way of thinking again)
There's also the danger of mistaking your social network universe for The Universe. This can lead to erroneous judgments and conclusions about the world around us.
Anyway, i should get back to work. Great post, Jay.
Thanks for the great comment Eli!
I guess, in some ways, the Twitter Firehose is whatever you make it. If you choose to follow people like yourself then you get lots of "self-affirming" tweets. If you choose to fill your firehose with people different than yourself, you get a shocking blast of dissonance. Human nature suggests that most of us go for warm and fuzzy firehoses instead of difficult and challenging ones, so maybe it's time to re-evaluate who you're following and look for some chances to interject new ideas and challenges.
Like does attract like, but I think there's something in what you said about "the people you connect to are sort of like you". Since they'll never be exactly like you, the areas in which you don't overlap are the ones in which their other interests are new to you. It's certainly true that we would never find any new sources of burgers if we all only followed people we were perfectly in sync with, but those out-of-phase bits are where discovery happens. It's not unlike last.fm — for example — where I regularly discover new music from people with whom I share similar but not identical musical tastes.
Thanks for the second great comment!